Google Responds to Educators’ Concerns

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

In response to educators’ concerns about this new encrypted search, Google has announced that they will move encrypted search to a new hostname, so schools can block Google’s https search without blocking other secure Google apps:

To prevent students from bypassing their filters, some schools are blocking encrypted search. However, a side effect of this action is that it also blocks other services hosted at Google’s secure URL, including Google Apps for Education, and many of our other services which require authentication to keep information safe. We’re working hard to address this issue as quickly as possible and in a few weeks we will move encrypted search to a new hostname – so schools can limit access to SSL search without disrupting other Google services, like Google Apps for Education.

See full post: http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/06/update-on-encrypted-web-search-in.html

We’re glad that this new development will allow our customers and other schools to keep searches safe and monitored (by blocking Google’s secure search) while still allowing access to the tools they rely on (by not blocking Google apps and mail). We will continue to keep you updated as the story of encrypted Google search unfolds.

Joel

Google Encrypted Search: What It Means for Schools

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Recently Google opened a new beta SSL search engine at https://google.com. According to CNET, “People who want to use the more secure search option can type ‘https://www.google.com’ into their browser, scrambling the connection so the words and phrases they search on, and the results that Google displays, will be protected from interception.”

While secure search is a nice option for consumers, it can create security and safety risks for schools.  With encrypted searches, schools are unable to:

  • easily enforce safe search
  • filter search results
  • log searches
  • block inappropriate Google video and image icons from search results

This limits much of the monitoring and reporting that educational IT staff needs to be able to conduct to ensure student safety and adherence to acceptable use policies. It also raises questions about CIPA compliance and associated federal e-rate funds.

And simply blocking the secure Google search site also blocks other encrypted Google sites, like Google Apps and Gmail due to the way Google has implemented the encrypted site. This can be crippling to schools that rely on these services for such things as hosted email and student projects . Many schools that were using Google Apps have had to block access to these services to ensure student safety and regulatory compliance.

Lightspeed Systems has been in communication with Google, trying to find a suitable workaround for educational institutions. After laying out the issues for all education users, we received this response: “Your concerns have stimulated discussion here, but the decision was to not make any changes at this time… We do continue to listen to the feedback of our users (both through you and from the schools directly) so it’s possible this could change in the future.”

If you’d like to weigh in with Google directly, please contact Jaime Casap, part of the Google Education Team.

For Lightspeed Systems customers, we’ve mapped out a couple of options: Block secure Google searches or Redirect Google web requests to other search engines. We are also working on other product updates that will help schools address this issue.

I understand the benefits of encrypted search in many situations, but it may not be a viable option for most schools, where safety on school-issued technology trumps a right to privacy. In fact, I think many businesses that monitor users to ensure policy adherence may have similar concerns.

What are your thoughts on the issue? How will it impact your school system?

How do we best resolve safety-access tradeoffs?

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Safety – Access Balance

“We have teachers who want to use the internet for all kinds of content and experiences for our students, but we have tech coordinators who are locking down our networks. What do we do about that?”
Kathleen Barnhart (Illinois Board of Education)

Finding the balance between safety and optimum instructional experiences is rapidly becoming one of the toughest issues in education.

Barnhart asked the question at a forum provided by the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), and she posed it to Aneesh Chopra, White House Chief Technology Officer, and Jim Shelton, the Assistant Secretary for Innovation and Improvement at the US Department of Education. Both had interesting answers.

Chopra, who served in a similar role for the Governor of Virginia and worked with the Virginia Department of Education on a number of projects, noted, “The typical role of the IT leader in an organization is cost management of decisions around procurement, etc, and it is really about risk mitigation.” He went on to say that you always will want the “lock the network down” voice, but you also want someone who will say ‘there are ways to involve students and content from the internet’ and you get those people to work it out.

Shelton’s answer paralleled that of Chopra. He said, “It is incumbent on all of us to create the environment in which people can take a little risk.”

Good idea – how do we actually do that?

Joel

BudTheTeacher’s “less is more” filtering policy

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I’ve added “instructional technologist” Bud Hunt of Colorado to the blog roll – as he also has lots to say of interest. His recent post regarding requests from teachers and other staff to block resources that are distractions in the classroom is particularly interesting. Below is his stock response to those requests:

Thanks for your question.  When we implemented our new filter this school year, we looked at all the things we were currently blocking, what things were required to be blocked by law, and what we were blocking that we shouldn’t be.

What we’ve decided is that we will no longer use the web filter as a classroom management tool.  Blocking one distraction doesn’t solve the problem of students off task – it just encourages them to find another site to distract them.  Students off task is not a technology problem – it’s a behavior problem.  It is our intention that we help students to learn the appropriate on-task behaviors instead of assuming that we can use filters to manage student use.  Rather than blocking sites on an ad hoc basis, we will instead be working with folks to help them through computer and lab management issues in a way that promotes student responsibility.  We know that the best filters in a classroom or lab are the people in that lab – both the educational staff monitoring student computer use as well as the students themselves.

This opens up possibilities for students and staff using websites for instructional purposes that in the past were blocked due to broad category blocks.  It requires that staff and students manage their technology use rather than relying on a third party solution that can never do the job of replacing teachers monitoring students.

That said, we will still block sites that are discovered to violate CIPA requirements.  If you discover one, please do not hesitate to share it with us.  Also, if you discover a site that shouldn’t be blocked, please pass that along so that we can open it up.

I hope this makes sense.  I’d be happy to speak further with you if you have further comments or questions.

Anyone else on this path?

Joel