Quick Start Guide for Integrating Generative AI Into Schools

Navigate the opportunities and risks of generative AI in K-12 education — with a practical checklist to get your district started.

Introduction

No recent topic has been more hotly discussed among K-12 educators than artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, generative AI. The fear among educators is that when used improperly, generative AI can subvert student learning outcomes. Not only can generative AI produce content on behalf of students, it can also hamper creative and critical thinking skill development among other considerations.

On the other hand, there are a great many benefits that can be realized by the proper use of generative AI in the classroom, by both students and teachers alike. And it’s that age-old paradox, the potential “good” versus “evil” that has educators so split on the use of generative AI tools.

Try as a great many might, generative AI is not going away. The genie is out of the bottle, so to speak, and it’s here to stay. It’s up to educators and edtech solution providers to determine the most effective way to tap into the technology’s potential while, at the same time, mitigate its very real risks.

This eBook is designed to help K-12 school districts navigate the still choppy waters of generative AI in education. It will guide you through the definition of generative AI, how it works, and its capabilities and limitations. Most importantly, it will provide you with an actionable checklist to effectively integrate generative AI into your district.

Generative AI is a form of artificial intelligence that learns from existing data to generate new content that reflects the characteristics of its training data but does not repeat it. As a result, generative AI produces a wide variety of new content, including images, videos, music, speech, text, software code, and product designs.

Some of the most popular generative AI tools for educators and students are ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, and the AI video platform, Synthesia, among others.

Not all AI tools used in school districts are generative AI applications. Predictive AI applications can analyze patterns in student data to forecast expected outcomes, such as being on track for promotion or graduation, for example. Those outputs allow educators to develop data-driven insights and proactively intervene as required.

Generative AI begins with a prompt. ChatGPT, for instance, responds to conversational text prompts to generate new content. Prompts for other solutions take the form of text, image, video, design, musical notes, or any input that the system processes.

Large language models (LLMs) then take over. Those LLMs, like the ones driving chatbots like ChatGPT, have been trained through deep learning algorithms to recognize, generate, translate, and summarize enormous quantities of written language and textual data.

After ingesting the original prompt, the generative AI platform’s algorithms deliver its new content in any of several forms, including essays, mathematical solutions, or even “deep fake” videos. New features in the quickly evolving space now allow users to refine initial results with feedback about the style, tone, voice, and other elements they want any subsequently generated content to reflect.

Generative AI begins with a prompt.

Much of the discussion on generative AI centers on better understanding the technology’s abilities and limitations—what it can and cannot do. Those conversations tend to naturally evolve into the potential benefits and risks inherent in the technology’s use.

Potential benefits of generative AI to school districts include:

  • Content ideation and development
  • Personalized assessments, tutoring, and learning assistance
  • Quick and timely feedback to students/parents
  • Administrative efficiencies

The potential application of generative AI in education appears seemingly endless. Perhaps the most promising aspect is the potential to create personalized, interactive learning content and experiences for each student.

A few of the many potential use case examples include:

  • Generate questions based on an individual student’s current level of understanding or achievement.
  • Deliver real-time feedback and assessments, empowering both teachers and students to identify individual strengths to leverage, opportunities to improve, and any additional supportive needs required.
  • Create personalized, adaptive lesson plans based on a student’s assessed level of aptitude and performance.
  • Develop interactive learning activities, including simulations and games, to engage students on a particular subject.
  • Provide step-by-step hints and suggestions to accelerate a student’s problem-solving and learning on an assignment.
  • Generate email and other messages for teachers to send to students, parents, and administrators.

Related to teaching resources, generative AI has the potential to act as a teacher’s virtual assistant, delivering individualized, real-time feedback and expanding the teaching capabilities at every educational level.

The most promising aspect is the potential to create personalized, interactive learning content and experiences for each student.

Of course, the flipside of generative AI’s benefits to educators is the technology’s limitations, challenges, and perceived threats.

Like all new technologies, generative AI also arrives with its fair share of limitations, challenges and potential for abuse, and concerns to school districts include:

  • Plagiarism and academic dishonesty
  • Compromised student data privacy and online safety
  • Perpetuating and further strengthening societal bias
  • Loss of critical thinking and reasoning skills due to overreliance on AI tools
  • Exacerbate the existing ‘digital divide’ and prevent digital equity among students

A primary concern lies in the potential for bias in generated educational content, as an AI app’s algorithms are only as good—and as unbiased—as the data on which it is trained. Perhaps nowhere does the old data science/data processing warning of “garbage in, garbage out” resonate more than with generative AI. If a tool is trained with biased data inputs, educational outputs will be created that perpetuate or even amplify stereotypes or prejudices. And, with its outputs consumed as additional inputs, the bias cycle perpetuates.

Then, of course, the digital divide between students with and without ready access to technology may be destined to widen by generative AI in education, adversely impacting underserved and minority students. There’s also the standing threat of a student’s data security, privacy, and online safety.

However, the biggest challenge of generative AI in education might be the threat of unethical use of the technology.

Naturally, plagiarism, the practice of taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own, is a dominant concern. But the challenge of generative AI as a crutch goes much deeper, with the threat of students relying too heavily on the technology to provide immediate answers stunting their ability to think critically and solve problems.

The biggest challenge of generative AI in education might be the threat of unethical use of the technology.

Currently, school districts are split as to the use and misuse of generative AI. At one end of the spectrum, some schools take a zero-tolerance approach, associating the use of generative AI tools with plagiarism. In that situation, districts deploy AI detection tools to identify instances when students deliver AI-generated assignments.

At the far other end of the spectrum are schools that work to integrate generative AI applications to support and further accelerate student learning. Rather than investing time and other resources in identifying misuse, teachers and other faculty work collaboratively to collectively understand the benefits, limitations, responsible use cases, and potential threats in using generative AI in school.

The generative AI debate continues, but in practice, most school districts have taken a hard stand against the tools. According to aggregate data pulled in October 2023 from the over 28,000 schools that deploy Lightspeed Filter™, over 92 percent of schools have blocked access to the most popular generative AI tools.

0 %

As of 2023, according to aggregate data from over 28,000 schools, 92% have blocked access to the most popular generative AI tools.

Naturally, blocking access, both on-campus and with school-issued devices, isn’t a long-term solution, as generative AI applications are not going to go away. Ever. At best, the current situation is a temporary measure as school districts evaluate how best to integrate generative AI technology into curricula and classrooms.

School districts can no longer delay integrating generative AI applications. Simply, teachers and students already have independent access to a great many AI tools, including, among others, systems that integrate AI, like search engines and email platforms.

Below is a checklist to effectively incorporate generative AI applications into K-12 school systems and promote critical learning outcomes.

Progress 0 / 11 completed
Establish Generative AI Guidelines & Revise Academic Policies
Ensure generative AI applications comply with existing data security and privacy policies before approving for use.
Clarify responsible and prohibited uses of AI applications and include specific examples.
Revise your academic integrity policy to include the use of generative AI tools, and ensure language is clear around the use of AI applications and their subsequent deliverables. Make certain examples of academic misconduct are updated with AI-specific examples.
Facilitate District-Wide Learning
Build collective district knowledge by facilitating professional development training on AI applications, both as learning and teaching efficiency aids, for all teachers and staff.
Review approved generative AI applications and the evaluation procedure followed for each.
Create selection criteria for future evaluation of new generative AI applications.
Establish guidelines and materials for coaching and counseling students on the proper use and misuse of generative AI applications in schoolwork.
Embrace AI Into the District's Culture
Involve teaching faculty to identify specific use cases where generative AI apps add value to the teacher-learner interaction and advance student learning outcomes.
Revise courses giving consideration to both learning styles and available AI educational applications.
Promote Continuous Improvement
Collect regular and ongoing feedback from students, parents, and teachers on how generative AI is impacting the learning environment, both positively and negatively.
Conduct regular, AI-specific faculty workshops to lift the overall level of understanding on how best to leverage AI tools in both curriculum design and day-to-day teaching practices.

Education has always been a noble, innovative profession, one quick to adapt to new tools and methods. Just as the availability of advanced scientific calculators over forty years ago caused a stir in math departments around the world, generative AI sparks similar concerns throughout schools.

However, just as scientific calculators didn’t go away, neither will generative AI applications—the technology is destined to become a staple in everyday life, including schooling and on the job.

To successfully integrate generative AI into schools, educators must fall back to their single-most guiding principle whenever making changes: enhancing learning experiences and producing better student learning outcomes.

Utilize the framework in the proceeding pages to effectively integrate generative AI into your school districts, facilitating learning and reducing administrative inefficiencies. Furthermore, please find additional resources on the very next page.

Establishing Generative AI Guidelines and Policies

Teaching and Learning with Generative AI Applications

You can't govern what you can't see

Before you can set policy, make decisions about access, or answer questions from your board, you need to know what’s actually happening.

The AI Usage Audit gives you that foundation.